top of page
Search

Author Values

  • Dec 12, 2023
  • 1 min read

Going into the writing, I believed very greatly that brute force was the best approach at combatting wildlife poaching. I thought that directly fighting against poachers would act as enough of a detterent to decrease the amount of animals killed. However, as I researched I came to notice that this wasn't the case. Of course, brute force was effective sometimes, however, it was more effective to have several detterent factors acting alongside brute force. I value nature a lot, and seeing how these criminals destroy and kill all of these different species angers me a lot. This is probably the reason why I believed brute force was the most effective. Since its the most direct way of facing the issue, literally head on.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Objectors!

My audience consists of conservationists, NGOs, and politicians working for a solution, or at least a reduction, to international...

 
 
 
Revision in My Writing Process

Revision was never truly a part of my writing process. Sure I'd read over the essay a few times after I finished writing it, however, I...

 
 
 
Reflecting on Issue

I chose wildlife poaching as my issue for the argumentative piece because I feel very strongly for the destruction of ecosystems, killing...

 
 
 

Comments


Any Opinions?!

Thanks for submitting!

© 2035 by Train of Thoughts. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page